Search Engine
“Bait and Switch”
by James T. Berger, 11 March 2005
<back
| | next>
As the
World Wide Web continues to become a dominant marketing communications
force in the business-to-business marketplace, the power of the
search engines and some of their policies are becoming tested in
the courts.
The B2B marketer should become increasing cognizant
of its own Web presence and how the search engines direct potential
customers to a Web site’s competitors. One such device is
the “sponsored links” notation that appears on searches
from some search engines. This has all the elements of electronic
“bait and switch.” The potential customer does a Web
search and when the search engine produces results there are the
sponsored links. If the customer clicks on a sponsored link, he/she
very well might be hooked into a competitor.
What makes this situation even more suspect is the
way the search engine charges the company that purchases “sponsored
links.” The compensation formula could be a certain set fee
for the sponsored link or it could be a charge for every time a
customer clicks on to the sponsored link or both or some other negotiated
formula.
There is another peril here. It is the silent codes
in a Web site. Behind the curtain of what you see on the screen
are all sorts of tags, metatags and codes that the customer never
sees but the spiders within the search engine seek out and which
cause these sites to appear as part of the search on YOUR Web site.
What’s a marketer to do?
The first thing is to constantly do Internet searches
on your site, competitive sites and descriptions of your business
using the various search engines – i.e. Google, Yahoo, MSN,
etc. – and see what comes up. The marketer should be particularly
cognizant of the “sponsored links.” The next step is
to consult with an intellectual property attorney with Internet
expertise. Finally, the marketer should keep abreast of the all
new court rulings concerning search engine “bait and switch.”
Unfortunately, the Internet arena has not legally
been defined. Court rulings are starting to establish precedents
but the communications medium is so new and expanding so rapidly.
That is why an attorney who is staying abreast of the latest rulings
is a valuable asset to any business using the Internet as a marketing
medium.
The last thing any marketer wants to do is use his
money and visibility to bring business to a competitor.
_____
Author
James T. Berger, Managing Editor of The
Wiglaf Journal. As Principal of James T. Berger/Market Strategies,
Berger does extensive consulting and survey work for intellectual
property litigation attorneys on matters of likelihood of confusion,
trade dress, secondary meaning and the Internet. Feel free to call
him at (847) 328-9633 or e-mail him at j-berger@northwestern.edu.
<back
| | next>
|