Best Practices:
SmartSynch’s Partnership
by Tim Smith, PhD, 19 March 2003
<back
| | next>
There are many go-to-market strategies for new technologies.
Firms can build their own sales and marketing team and go-direct,
take a licensing strategy and allow others to commercialize their
technology, or explore opportunities between these two extremes
in a partner distribution strategy. Each go-to-market strategy presents
its own complexities, tradeoffs, and challenges.
In September of 2002, SmartSynch (www.smartsynch.com)
and Itron (www.itron.com) announced
their partnership agreement for Itron to distribute SmartSynch’s
SmartMeter Solution (SM) to the utilities metering market.
What were SmartSynch’s decision criteria for
selecting this strategy? Why partner with Itron and not another?
And, how far does the partnership extend? In order to reveal the
critical elements to achieving this strategic partnership, I spoke
with Mark Rodgers, CEO of SmartSynch.
SmartSynch
SmartSynch, launched in the Spring of 2000, utilizes wireless two-way
telemetry for reading and managing the dataflow to commercial and
industrial (C&I) meters.
For the two years prior to the distribution partnership,
SmartSynch had been selling directly to utilities. During this period,
SmartSynch grew in their understanding of the psychology and approach
of the utilities buying committee. Mr. Rodgers noted that utilities
are very pragmatic in their approach to technology companies. Their
purchase decision making process for capital acquisitions requires
a six to nine month sales cycle. Furthermore, in evaluating a new
firm’s offering, they also evaluate the firm according to
its track record and financials to determine their expectation of
future performance.
Why Partner?
Despite the challenges in selling directly to utilities, SmartSynch
had achieved 18 major utility accounts, including Chicago’s
own ComEd. Given this success, one might ask, why should SmartSynch
partner? Alternatively, why not sell the firm?
Mr. Rodgers understood that further success would
be achieved more rapidly if SmartSynch could leverage the sales
force of a larger firm. Furthermore, a sales force that could approach
utilities with more than a C&I metering solution is more economically
efficient than a dedicated sales team. To capture the revenue achievement
associated with size and the economic efficiency associated with
scope, SmartSynch needed to have access to the sales force of a
larger, more diversified firm.
Getting the access to a large sales force could have
also been achieved by selling the entire firm. When asked about
being acquired, Mr. Rodgers commented on the current depressed market
valuation for technology companies. However, this short-term explanation
is only half the story. The core technology of SmartSynch is a two-way
data transceiver operating over a public wireless infrastructure.
This core technology can be leveraged into markets other than utilities.
Selling SmartSynch and its technology to a firm dedicated to the
utilities market would have hampered the potential of leveraging
this technology into alternative verticals. As such, SmartSynch
needed to remain independent to pursue multiple revenue streams.
Which Partner?
Once SmartSynch had settled upon a distribution partnership strategy,
Mr. Rodgers executed an analysis of various partnership possibilities.
The analysis evaluated potential partners according to their strength
in capturing the market and the potential synergies for improving
the value offering. No fewer than 12 potential partners had been
identified. With each of these firms, SmartSynch established relationships
and explored the potential.
The distribution strength of a potential partner was
evaluated according to their sales force in SmartSynch’s core
market: utilities. In evaluating the sales force, different metrics
included the number of utility customers, the number of sales representatives,
the average tenure of the sales representative, and the sales compensation
plan.
The industries of the potential partners varied. Each
industry offered specific areas for the development of complimentary
offerings and synergistic value creation. The industries included
telecommunication firms for leveraging the two-way wireless telemetry,
software firms for leveraging the ability to integrate data communications,
meter manufacturers for leveraging the value of C&I meters,
and Itron for complimenting their own strength in residential wireless
metering and leveraging their meter data management and private
wireless network.
What Made Itron the Right Partner?
For SmartSynch, Itron is the optimal distribution partner in both
their strength of distribution and potential for value-offering
synergies.
Itron has over 2000 clients worldwide in the gas,
electric, and water industries. Founded in 1977, Itron also has
longstanding relationships throughout the utilities market. These
facts indicate that Itron is well positioned to reach the utility
customer and distribute SmartSynch’s value offering.
SmartSynch’s technology can work with any wireless
network, is hardware agnostic, and can easily be integrated with
a variety of software applications. Each of these technological
factors highly compliments Itron’s offering and improve the
potential synergies for increasing the value provided to customers.
Itron has been building private wireless network solutions
for their clients. With SmartSynch’s product, Itron now has
the ability to offer wireless metering solutions over private and
public networks. Generally, private wireless networks utilizing
narrowband PCS are the lowest-cost means for managing C&I metering
in rural areas. In populated geographies, public networks using
GSM, PCS, CDMA, or any other wireless protocol are more cost efficient.
Combining Itron’s private wireless network with SmartSynch’s
public wireless network technology enables Itron to approach clients
with a lowest-cost, whole-solution offering.
With regards to software, Itron’s MV90 software
for metering data verification and pre-billing functionality is
the long established leader throughout the utilities industry. A
tight integration between SmartSynch’s software and Itron’s
software lowers customer’s costs. At the same time, the potential
for interfacing SmartSynch’s software with other meter data
verification software remains viable.
Although there are high value-offering synergies between
SmartSynch and Itron, there are also means in which SmartSynch can
provide value to customers using non-Itron products. For instance,
SmartSynch’s two-way wireless telemetry can work with any
C&I meter. Their relationship with Itron didn’t block
the potential for deploying this solution on Elster, Landis + Gyr,
or any other vendor’s meter.
What Terms to Partnership?
Itron’s agreement to distribute SmartSynch’s solution
is the foundation to their relationship. Going forward, SmartSynch
remains responsible for establishing their own brand, uncovering
demand, supporting sales, and developing further value offerings.
And, to provide incentive for Itron’s sales function, sufficient
channel profits must be maintained.
SmartSynch’s agreement with Itron places the
sales and customer management responsibility with Itron while requiring
sales support from SmartSynch. At the frontline, SmartSynch’s
sales force that had been selling directly to utilities were redirected
towards channel management and sales support activities. Tight integration
between SmartSynch’s and Itron’s back office was undertaken
for managing the customer messaging effort. Specific customer responses
are required for financial models that demonstrate the expense avoidance
achieved with SmartSynch’s solution. These financial models
are produced by SmartSynch with input data gathered by Itron. Also,
in the timely fulfillment of customer’s RFIs and RFQs, Itron
shares requirements and SmartSynch produces responses.
To clarify demand, SmartSynch has segmented the utility
market. Market segmentation enables Itron’s sales force to
efficiently determine which prospects will have the highest demand
for their solution. For SmartSynch’s solution, there are three
major customer segments. The investor owned utilities are profiled
functionally according to the number of C&I customers and number
of telephone modem lines. SmartSynch’s solution displaces
the need for telephone modems allowing for a straightforward ROI
sale to occur with appropriate customers. With smaller utilities,
such as municipalities and co-ops, Itron and SmartSynch approach
customers with a service bureau offering wherein Itron hosts the
solution. This service offering directly addresses the budget constraints
faced by smaller firms. A third market segment that has expressed
a high demand for SmartSynch’s solution includes the “Security
Market”. Federal and municipal building managers that desire
to lower the foot traffic of meter readers within their building
value SmartSynch’s wireless solution.
Other aspects of their relationship extend to future
product development and geographic boundaries. Itron’s and
SmartSynch’s product managers have worked together to develop
a technical roadmap to ensure each other’s future. As to geography,
the current agreement is limited to North America. This limitation
is imposed by the need to provide high customer service for implementation
and ongoing service.
Economic Partnership Agreement
The keys to making this distribution partnership agreement valuable
for SmartSynch, Itron, and their customers are economic in nature.
The tradeoffs made in selecting to partner versus the alternatives
represent economic efficiency gained by leveraging a sales force
with multiple value offerings for the same client while keeping
a potential open for leveraging core technology into other industries.
The tradeoffs made in choosing a partner represent economic gain
created through synergies in sales and products. And, the tradeoffs
made in assigning responsibility between Itron and SmartSynch represent
economic efficiency issues in assigning responsibilities to the
party most prepared to accomplish them. Strong partnerships, like
this between SmartSynch and Itron, are rarely opportunistic but
rather strategic approaches to increasing the value provided to
customers and improving both parties’ ability to capture a
portion of that value.
----
For further coverage of SmartSynch, see
Repositioning Technology: Scott Davis of SmartSynch printed July
11, 2002 in the Wiglaf Journal. (http://www.wiglafjournal.com/Articles/2002/2002-07-11%20Repositioning%20Technology%20-%20SmartSynch.htm)
---
Author: Tim Smith, PhD is a principal
at Wiglaf, a Market Research and Sales and Marketing Strategy consultancy
serving tech-driven businesses operating in business markets. Small
and medium sized businesses select Wiglaf for our quantitative and
fact driven approach to intelligent revenue growth. www.wiglaf.biz.
<back
| | next>
|