e-Business
Roundtable: Wireless Panel Overview
by Tim Smith, PhD, July 16, 2002
<back|
|next>
At the Realities of Wireless in Customer Relationship
Management event, hosted by the e-Business Roundtable of the University
of Chicago GSB, experts expressed their viewpoints and experiences
concerning the application of wireless computing business problems.
Representing a broad array of experiences in the field
of mobile computing and Customer Relationship Management, Benjamin
Hill of Sapient provided a business consultant’s perspective,
Swan Allen of 27Co discussed technology adoption and barriers to
implementation, Josh Rubin of Motorola highlighted issues of the
wireless device’s user interface, and Alexander Sherman of
the Field Museum introduced us to his organization’s experiment
with a wireless application.
---------------
Mr. Hill of Sapient initiated the discussion with an overview of
the business issues in wireless computing: timing of industry adoption,
value requirements, and issues to be addressed in deployment.
In regards to timing, Mr. Hill mentioned a Gartner
report which indicates 35% of all employees are currently mobile.
This fact warrants the expectation of increased employee productivity
by providing mobile access to corporate information. On the consumer
front, people have become accustomed to customer service anytime
and increasingly anywhere. In tandem with these demand factors,
supply factors creating the possibility of positive returns-on-investment
are related to technological advances in standardization and better
performance leading to lower cost structures with greater benefits.
In short, wireless data management is a maturing technology undergoing
increased demand.
Mr. Hill stated that the business case for wireless
is becoming clearer. For enterprise solutions, mobile sales force
automation and other mobile employee productivity tools are clear
examples of projects exhibiting positive ROI for the enterprises
adopting them. It is more difficult to demonstrate the value and
benefits of consumer oriented solutions. To some degree, the differences
in the clarity of the business case are correlated to difficulties
in end-user adoption. Within an enterprise, employee adoption can
be limitedly mandated. External to the enterprise, people adopt
technology only after learning the clear and compelling benefits.
As such, Mr. Hill was able to give four reasons that might compel
an enterprise to adopt a wireless data solution: Requirements for
Real Time Information, Requirements for Anytime/Anywhere Information,
the Need for the Remote Capture of Digital Information (voice, image,
or text), or the Need for Transmission of Data in the Digital State.
In exploring the business issues of deploying a wireless
solution, Mr. Hill shared a paradigm that included user and technological
challenges. For the user challenge dimension, Sapient has created
a map for identifying the impact of a wireless data solution. It
is based in analyzing tasks according to Activity, Actor, Tools,
Location, and then predicting the Mobile Impact. For the technological
challenge dimension, Mr. Hill mentioned device level issues of the
user interface, portability, and data capacity; network level issues
of reliability and security; and the enterprise level issues of
access, maintenance, and security.
---------------
Mr. Allen of 27Co followed with a discussion of barriers to widespread
adoption of wireless data solutions. According to Mr. Allen, many
of the barriers to deployment of useful consumer wireless solutions
are related to the current industry and regulatory structure of
the wireless network carriers. The network carrier mandates the
end-user data-interface to the handset makers, restricts content
access to their approved wireless web sites, and controls the flow
of data between the end user and the enterprise seeking to transmit
data to that user. This has caused conflicts of interest between
the wireless network carrier and enterprises seeking to contact
potential customers. As an example, Mr. Allen mentioned the desire
of enterprises to offer with rental cars to travelers upon their
arrival at a non-home town airport. While the wireless network carrier
can identify when its users that are “roaming”, they
do not have to share this information with other enterprises. This
makes it difficult for third parties to solicit business from these
individuals. In light of this and similar experiences, Mr. Swan
sees no impending action from the wireless network carriers to increase
the demand for wireless data solutions. Instead, he predicts that
it will be non-telecom enterprises and entrepreneurs that will give
customers the compelling event to adopt 3G and the Wireless Web.
---------------
Turning to the handset providers, Mr. Rubin discussed the problem
solving approach Motorola is taking toward the design of the handset
and the wireless web browser interface. Without stating specifics,
he noted that the design demands of enterprise users and consumer
users for wireless data access and management were distinctly different.
Overall, the design of the user interface must encompass dimensions
of usefulness – does the interface create efficiency, usability
– can the users use it, and desirability – do the users
enjoy it. On these points, market research has yielded Motorola
insight into the design requirements of the handset. Given the option
of a user interface that requires fewer keystrokes but more complicated
data entry versus multiple keystrokes but easy to understand data
entry, users preferred interfaces requiring multiple keystrokes
that are easy to use.
Mr. Rubin also offered an industry perspective of
wireless data management. He noted that although the PC is currently
the hub for data management, Motorola anticipates a change in the
market structure wherein the cell phone and wireless devices will
become the future hub for data management. This is a bold statement
given the applications, disk space, screen size, and number of other
features that currently drive the deepening relationship between
people and their PCs.
---------------
Finally, Mr. Sherman of The Field Museum entertained us with Stanley,
the wireless web solution tested at The Field Museum. While The
Field Museum considered an enterprise solution, they realized that
their enterprise data infrastructure was unprepared for such a task.
Instead, they chose to test a wireless web solution directed at
museum visitors. A sample of museum visitors was given Handspring
wireless devices that were directed to Stanley, the Field Museum’s
web site. The content on the Stanley mostly concerned logistical
information such as where the exhibits were, how to find the washroom
facilities, or what special events were occurring. Also on Stanley
was information from scientist at archeological sites and other
facts about the exhibits. The Field Museum tested Stanley as a possible
offering to future patrons.
In watching the users of Stanley, The Field Museum
noticed that visitors paid greater attention to the logistical information
on the site than to emails from the scientist or exhibit facts.
Moreover, this access to logistical information increased the time
spent in the exhibits by the patrons, increased the number of participants
at the special events, and improved the ability of people to find
the washrooms. For instance, out of an average longevity of 3 hours
at the Field Museum, typical visitors will spend nearly 30 minutes
in the main hall planning their day and selecting exhibits. The
access to the exhibit logistical information reduced planning time
greatly, getting the visitors out of the main hall and into the
exhibits quickly, thus providing museum visitors with greater value.
All of the logistical information in Stanley was available
to non-sample visitors of the museum in different formats as well.
The exhibit information is provided to every visitor in the form
of a brochure. The special events are advertised on kiosks appearing
throughout the museum. And the washroom facilities are well marked
and highlighted on the map given to all visitors. There was zero
new content in Stanley.
---------------
Yours truly noted incongruence between the business value found
in the Field case and that predicted by Sapient. The desirability
and usefulness of Stanley is odd because it indicates that none
of the expected reasons to adopt a wireless solution in enterprises
was found in this consumer trial. The data did not need to be real
time, nor was it unavailable to remote users, much less did consumers
need to capture or transmit digital data to the Museum. After the
presentation, I approached. Mr. Hill of Sapient regarding this issue
and he concurred with my observation. Perhaps the business drivers
to consumer adoption of wireless solutions are one area where business
theory can be improved.
---
Tim Smith, PhD is a principal at Wiglaf, a Market Research and Sales
and Marketing Strategy consultancy serving tech-driven businesses
operating in business markets. Small and medium sized businesses
select Wiglaf for our quantitative and fact driven approach. www.wiglaf.biz.
------------
Also Appearing in
The May Report, TECH BUSINESS BRIEFS, July 16, 2002
<back|
|next>
|