The Next
Disruptive Technology - Distributed Generation
by Tim Smith, PhD, September 25, 2000
<back|
|next>
Is Enron coming for lunch?
Introduction
The past three decades have offered ample evidence
of the ability of disruptive technologies to create and redistribute
wealth. From disc-drives, to flat panel displays, to audiocassettes,
each of these technological advances have shared a set of the common
features: An existing technology satisfied the market demand. A
newly invented technology suffered in Performance-to-Price compared
to the existing, dominant technology. Most customers were satisfied
with the existing technology and only start-ups or whackos would
invest their career in making the new technology work. But, in the
next life-cycle of the product category, improvements enabled the
new technology to satisfy the market demand and the older technologies
were relegated to niche uses. The market was disrupted by the new
technology that was in many ways inferior, but in a few superior.

Distributed generation is another disruptive technology
that can overturn the entire energy industry in the near future.
How an energy generation company reacts will determine its position
in the next round of competition. In this paper, I will discuss
how distributed generation is a disruptive technology and, as such,
how an energy generation company can react to take advantage of
this new market opportunity.
Concentrated Generation Trajectory
In the past, energy companies pursued a safe pathway
towards profits through increasing their efficiency and reliability
for their customers. The pathway included heavy infrastructure investments
in transmission and distribution to allow for the efficient flow
of energy throughout geographic regions. Concurrently, larger power
plants offered more efficient conversion of energy from raw materials
to electricity. Combined, these features offered clear returns to
scale similar to the brewing, DRAM and automobile industries. To
improve the value capture along this value chain, incremental improvements
in the technology were pursued and the Performance-to-Price trajectory
continued its upward trend. Energy production followed a concentrated
generation trajectory.
Distributed Generation Trajectory
Distributed generation has been discussed since the
time of Thomas Edison but for many reasons it has never been very
popular or profitable. It offers a lower power-generating efficiency.
It relies on locating a small generation plant close to a customer
who is often in an urban area with strong NIMBY coalitions. Odder
still, it might require customers to be both consumers and generators
of energy – actively managing their resources. Simply put,
distributed generation’s Performance-to-Price metric has been
inferior to that of concentrated generation.
Yet there are always improvements. Just as concentrated
generation, distributed generation technology has followed an upward
Performance-to-Price trajectory. Improvements in fuel-cells and
natural gas generators, changes in attitudes concerning pollution
of coal-fired plants, and the demand for ever increasing reliability
for some C&I customers has brought discussions concerning distributed
generation out of the realm of the fantastical. However, even though
the Performance-to-Price trajectory of distributed generation has
followed an upward trend, it is questionable as to if it will ever
catch up with the concentrated generation trajectory. But this may
not matter.
Market Demand
While the Performance-to-Price metric of distributed
generation may be inferior to that of concentrated generation, what
is of importance is its position in relation to the market’s
demand. The market will seek power from the source that satisfies
its entire set of needs the most effectively. While concentrated
generation technology has performed well in the past, distributed
generation may meet a market segment’s needs better. When
the market needs are fulfilled by distributed generation, concentrated
generation technology will be relegated to niche status.
Distributed generation, like other disruptive technologies
in the past, solve a different set of problems and offer a different
value proposition than the existing technology. Hence looking for
opportunities or applications of this technology is equal to looking
for niches in the current market – market segmentation. A
clear value of distributed generation in comparison to existing
concentrated generation technology lies in the ability to produce
energy in African developing countries where reliable power grids
would be prohibitively expensive to build. In the States, distributed
generation offers the ability to both cleanly produce electricity
and providing alternative uses of the dissipative heat in warming
an office building. Alternatively, it can offer more reliable service,
cost-effectiveness in lowering peak load, or enable the C&I
customer to make real-time decisions whether to buy energy from
the market, or supply energy to the market.
Conclusion
What makes a disruptive technology disruptive is that
it overturns a market and creates a new set of players. In the disc-drive
industry, each new size of the floppy disc, from 8” to 5 ¼”,
from 5 ¼” to 3 ½”, and now to the mini-disc,
has brought a new firm to the forefront of the disc-drive industry.
Distributed generation has the ability to do the same for the energy
industry.
To prepare for the upset of the market that will be brought by distributed
generation, current energy generation companies have a few options:
• Experiment with distributed generation and
be a market leader.
• Wait for others to develop the technology
and be a fast follower.
• Ignore it and await to be a niche player or
worse - an acquired dinosaur.
The choice of which route to take is for the generating
company to make, but based upon the aggression that some relative
newcomers in the market have expressed, the question may be one
of having your lunch or being theirs.
---
Tim Smith, PhD is a principal at Wiglaf, a Market Research and Sales
and Marketing Strategy consultancy serving tech-driven businesses
operating in business markets. Small and medium sized businesses
select Wiglaf for our quantitative and fact driven approach. www.wiglaf.biz.
----
" The Next Disruptive Technology - Distributed
Generation”, Timothy Smith, Chicago Business, September 25,
2000, p22.
<back|
|next>
|